There is no doubt...

we are running it (supposedly you never know) to improve the running game an particularly short yardage situaions. There is also no doubt Clemson has inexperince on the OL. What I don't buy into is that Chad Morris or anyone else went there because they expect the OL to be so weak or as a fix for it. I sure hope not, because unlike the option this is likely not to work very well for that. We all know what happens when you line the RB up deeper in the backfield with a poor offensive line. Its a loss of yardage every time, because unlike the option there has to be a hole there and if defenders are getting penetration like they do with a poor OL, the QB is not even likely to ge the ball to the RB being closer to the line of scrimmage. Again, this seems like an offense that will take advantage of faster impact players, which is smart. I simply think we would have gone no matter what because it seems like a good thing to add to your arsenal. Its put to rest as far as I am concerned, I think we are close to agreeing anyway.

But, I hope you are right and this does help a weak OL out. Otherwise we could be in for a long year.