When did I say WVU wasn't any good?

You're the one making stuff up lol. May be you should trade Maryland for Temple if you want to judge a program's value by one game. There is a reason conferences don't want WVU. But they would still be a much better choice than Syracuse or Pitt. Unless we're talking basketball I guess?

I realise that A&M and Mizzou would be SEC teams when they make the move? But they still bring the same value that the computers look for. The same value they have brought to Texas and Oklahoma when they beat them in the past. Pitt and Syracuse bring less value from a football standpoint than what the ACC already has, and that is pretty bad.

So if South Carolina went undefeated and beat #1 Bama or #1 LSU (whichever it would be) in the SEC title game we wouldn't beat out all of the teams I named to play for it all? Pretty sure we would be ranked #1 or #2 and It would be us playing Oklahoma. We would take the place of Bama or LSU and no one is beating out those guys to play for it. You're kidding yourself bro if you think otherwise lol.

In Clemson's case this season if any of these teams are undefeated: LSU, Bama, Oklahoma, Ok St, Whisky, Stanford, and possibly Boise St would beat out an undefeated Clemson team.

Really no need to argue over it. I think Clemson is going undefeated this season and the BCS computer's will prove my point.

What is the point in going undefeated if you get no shot a the national title though? No need to bring up Carolina either because we couldn't go undefeated in the Conference USA much less the SEC so you can drop that argument. This about Clemson and the ACC anyway, no need to drag lowly Carolina into it to try to make an argument.