I know you always...

like to compare them to Clemson. But that is not really a good way to make your point. Why don't you go through your DL specifically your back-ups (starters are mostly good/great) compare them to the guys you lost last year and explain why they are as good or better than who you lost in terms of depth on your DL.

Clemson's DL for example has not been very good the past couple of years, thats well documented. Your DL on the other hand has been arguably the strongest asset for your team. So if you are comparing them to Clemson's DL the past couple of years I will start to get excited.

Ryan, sounds like a solid and very honest post.