I agree with Ryan's post as well but

If Clemson has great depth on both lines and South Carolina's is comparable then I don't see why we don't have great depth on both lines just like Clemson does?

If we don't have great depth because of "unknowns" would Clemson not fall into that same category? What is your reasoning that Clemson has great depth on both lines? Not disagreeing with you just saying that until you tell me why I can say the same for Carolina..